Cash vs Card vs UPI vs Cheque vs DD: Which Payment Method Is Safest for Retailers? [discussions with chatGpt]

Query:

Suppose I am service/good provider providing various retail items/services from my retail store. Items /services may be like grocery, stationary, fruit, vegitable, electricals, electronics, garments, home decor, repair services of mobile, washing machine, etc whatever that can be gussed. No credit/debit card, only hard cash accepted. I provide full GST invoice to customers/business customer n run my business in full authentic way following all tax, etc complainces. Some customer comes to my store n purchases my service/good & paid in hard cash. I don't have any idea who that customer is, from where money comes to him, etc. (But in reality this money was stollen/ robbed/ hawala/ laundring/ malicious money for which I dont have any knowledge at all) Later on legal authorities captured that customer, enquired his where did he spend these money & came to know he purchased various items from various stores including mine. Then do I need to return those money or that money belongs to me only since I provided legal service to that customer

In your described scenario — where:

You run a fully compliant, GST-registered business.
You accept only hard cash (legal tender).
You provide goods/services with proper GST invoices.
You have no knowledge about the customer's background or source of funds.
The customer is later found to have used illicit/illegal money (e.g., stolen, hawala, laundered) to make purchases from your shop.

Then legally, in India:

✅ You are not liable to return the money.

Why:

Bonafide transaction:
You entered into a legitimate, arm's-length transaction. You provided goods/services in exchange for Indian legal tender, and the transaction was documented via a proper tax invoice. As long as you acted in good faith, your legal rights are protected.
Doctrine of innocent recipient (as per Indian Contract and Criminal Law):
If you received the payment without knowledge or intention of wrongdoing, you're considered an innocent third party. Law generally protects such parties when consideration is given (i.e., you provided value).
GST and Income Tax compliance:
Since you're issuing GST invoices, reporting in returns, paying taxes, and recording cash sales properly — your part of the transaction is traceable and lawful.
No mens rea (criminal intent) on your part:
Since you had no intent or knowledge of any crime, you’re not complicit under laws like PMLA (Prevention of Money Laundering Act) or IPC.

🟡 Important Caveats:

If you had any prior knowledge or suspicion about the customer’s illegal activities and still accepted the cash — you could be considered complicit or negligent.
If law enforcement or a court orders a seizure of goods (not money) you sold (e.g., in case they were bought using stolen money), they might retrieve those specific goods, but not the money you received — unless it’s proven you were part of the laundering/robbery operation.
Large cash transactions (above ₹2 lakh) from a single person in a day may require PAN disclosure under IT Rules (Rule 114B). While it doesn’t make the transaction illegal, non-compliance may attract scrutiny.

🧾 What You Should Do (Best Practices):

Always issue GST invoice and maintain CCTV records or sale logs.
Keep daily cash register books updated.
For high-value cash sales, try to record PAN or KYC to be safer.
File accurate GST and income tax returns.
Avoid structuring (e.g., breaking a ₹3 lakh sale into three ₹99,000 bills) to bypass rules — it’s a red flag in audit.

🧠 Summary:

You are not required to return the money, and it legally belongs to you, since you:

Provided real goods/services,
Collected legal cash tender,
Issued GST invoice,
Had no knowledge of any crime.

As long as your documentation is clean, you are protected under Indian law.

If you want, I can draft a standard SOP or disclaimer notice for your counter or invoices to further strengthen your legal position.

And suppose that customer paid some advance for receiving service in below cases: 1. customer paid money in advance, I for servicing him I purchases some goods/services from other business for fulfilment of his order 2. customer do advance booking for taking that service in specified date

Your follow-up scenario now includes advance payments from a customer later found to be involved in criminal activity (e.g., theft, hawala, money laundering), where you had no knowledge about that — and based on that advance:

Two cases you mentioned:

✅ Case 1: Customer pays advance, and you purchase goods/services to fulfill the order

Legal position:
You acted in the normal course of business. Advance received → you used it to procure items or subcontract service → legitimate and traceable business chain.
Your liability?
➤ You are not liable to return the advance.
➤ You are not criminally liable because you acted in good faith and against a lawful order.
Even if goods are not delivered yet, you incurred expenses, so law sees this as a valid commercial transaction.
Only exception:
If court or law enforcement directly orders to freeze the transaction or goods under investigation, you may need to cooperate, but you won’t be required to return any money unless explicitly ordered by a competent court.

✅ Case 2: Customer pays advance for booking a service at a future date

You received payment + issued a tax invoice or advance receipt.
You haven’t yet incurred cost or delivered service.

Here:

If law enforcement asks you to cancel the transaction and freeze funds before service is delivered — you may be asked to hold or refund the advance only under court direction.
Otherwise, you’re entitled to retain or proceed with service — unless you’re legally restrained.

🟡 Important Points in Advance Cases:

1. Advance invoices must be GST compliant

Use "Advance Received" invoices with correct GST code if applicable (especially in B2B).
Reflect the amount in GSTR-1 (Table 11A/11B) and adjust once actual invoice is raised.

2. Maintain bank/cash trail

Record cash advances properly in ledger.
Get customer's signature/acknowledgment if possible for large advances.

3. Documented use of advance

If you purchased goods/services using that advance (Case 1), keep all bills, vendor invoices, delivery challans, etc., to prove clean intent and transparent trail.

4. Refund only if forced by court order

You don’t voluntarily return the amount unless there's clear court instruction or you cancel the contract/service on your own.

📌 Summary:

Case	Should You Return Money?	Legal Protection	Notes
1. Advance used to fulfill order	❌ No	✅ Yes	You incurred cost and acted in good faith.
2. Advance for future booking	❌ (unless court directs)	✅ Yes	May need to hold/refund only if ordered by legal authority.

If you'd like, I can help you:

Draft a standard “Advance Payment” clause to include in your receipts.
Create terms & conditions for such cases to add on invoices or printed boards for customer acknowledgement.

Now above were senarious related to hard csh. Now suppose above senarious where customer used stolen Debit/credit card.. Original debit/card holder did't do any complain as it was without his knowledge & after 10 D of stolen credit/debit card he got knowledge he complaint in legal dept & that customer was caught. But that customer used debit/credit card to make various purchases from various stores including mine

This is an excellent and important distinction — now you're asking:

Suppose a customer used a stolen debit/credit card (unknown to the real owner), and:

You processed the transaction,

Provided goods/service,

Issued full GST invoice,

Had no knowledge the card was stolen,

The real cardholder files complaint after 10 days and law catches the fraudster later.

⚖️ What Happens in This Case?

🟡 Key Difference from Hard Cash:

Card payments (digital) are governed not just by contract/tax laws but also by:
- IT Act, RBI regulations, and
- Banking chargeback systems (Visa, MasterCard, RuPay, etc.).

❗ Risk: Chargeback or Payment Reversal

Once the real cardholder disputes the transaction, the bank can initiate a chargeback (i.e., forcibly pull back the money from your account via your payment gateway or bank).
Even if you delivered goods legally, and issued GST invoice, banks can still reverse the transaction.
This is because card networks operate under consumer protection — merchant liability exists in “unauthorized card use” cases.

🔍 So What Can Happen to You?

Scenario	Will You Lose the Money?	Notes
You received card payment, processed via swipe/UPI/net POS, then delivered goods	🟡 Possibly Yes	Bank may reverse payment under chargeback
You already used that money (e.g., bought materials for service)	✅ You still lose the money if chargeback happens	You’ll lose both goods & payment
You refused refund or didn’t know about chargeback	❌ Still deducted	It is done automatically at backend by card processor

✅ Your Legal Liability?

You are not criminally liable (as per Indian Penal Code or IT Act) if:

You followed regular business process (invoice, GST, POS receipt).
You had no knowledge the card was stolen.
You provided genuine goods/services.

So, you won’t be arrested or prosecuted, but you may suffer monetary loss via banking route.

🛡️ How to Protect Yourself (for future):

Use only secured payment gateways / POS
- Prefer EMV chip+PIN or OTP authenticated payments.
- Avoid accepting swipe-only transactions where PIN not asked.
Enable fraud detection on POS
- Most banks offer “risk scoring” or alerts — get that activated.
Capture customer ID for large transactions
- For example, any card transaction over ₹25,000 → ask for PAN/Aadhar copy or selfie with card (if possible).
Don’t deliver goods/service instantly for suspicious high-value transactions
- Hold for a few hours/days to confirm with bank if needed.
Keep CCTV, invoice copies, payment proof
- In case of investigation, you’ll be protected from criminal prosecution.

📌 Summary

Point	Hard Cash	Stolen Card
Can you keep the money?	✅ Yes	❌ Usually No (chargeback risk)
Legal/Criminal Risk?	❌ No	❌ No (if unaware)
Payment recall possible?	❌ No	✅ Yes, via chargeback
Best defense?	Proper invoice & tax	Use secure card processing + records

Would you like a sample “Card Use Disclaimer” or merchant T&C text you can add to your POS counter or invoice footer to protect yourself better?

So hard csh n card payment I understood What about above kind of issue in case of direct bank to bank transfer via UPI, NEFT, RTGS, IMPS, etc

Great — now you're asking about direct bank-to-bank digital payments (e.g., UPI, NEFT, RTGS, IMPS):

What happens if a customer uses a stolen bank account or mobile-linked UPI (without the real account holder's knowledge), and:

You receive full payment in your account,

Provide goods/services,

Issue full GST invoice,

Later the real account holder files a complaint, and the fraudster is caught.

✅ Are You Criminally Liable?

No, as long as:

You had no knowledge the payment was unauthorized or fraudulent.
You provided real goods/services and issued valid GST invoice.
You acted in good faith.

You are an innocent third-party recipient — not part of the fraud.

⚠️ Can the Bank or Authorities Reverse the UPI/NEFT Payment?

🚫 NEFT/RTGS/IMPS/UPI are push-based, non-reversible systems.

This means:

Bank CANNOT automatically reverse the payment (unlike credit card chargebacks).
The payer bank can request you to return the funds voluntarily.
But you can legally refuse if you already provided the goods/service and had no role in the fraud.

🟡 What Legal Options Does the Real Account Holder Have?

File FIR and request police to freeze your account temporarily.
- Bank may freeze only if court/police directs — not automatically.
Court Civil Suit:
The defrauded person can file a civil recovery suit claiming wrongful enrichment.
- You can defend saying: “I received the money in good faith and gave goods/service + tax invoice in return.”
- Courts usually protect innocent recipients in such bonafide commercial transactions.

🛡️ Your Strongest Protection:

Requirement	Reason
GST Invoice	Proves valid transaction.
Delivery Proof	CCTV, delivery challan, signed receipt.
Bank Statement	Shows receipt with traceable UPI/NEFT ref.
No Suspicion	If you didn’t know buyer was fraud, no criminal angle.

🟨 Summary Table

Mode	Reversal Risk	Criminal Risk	Bank Can Auto-Reverse?	Your Liability if Acted in Good Faith
💵 Hard Cash	❌ No	❌ No	❌ No	✅ Safe
💳 Credit/Debit Card	✅ Yes (chargeback)	❌ No	✅ Yes	❌ Money lost if charged back
💻 UPI/NEFT/IMPS/RTGS	❌ No auto-reverse	❌ No	❌ No	✅ Safe if no fraud on your part

🔒 What You Can Do for Higher Safety:

Maintain KYC for large UPI/NEFT/IMPS transactions (e.g., above ₹50K or ₹1L).
Mention in receipt/invoice:

"Payment received via UPI Ref. XYZ. Goods delivered as per invoice. No refund without legal directive."
Avoid high-value instant delivery to unknown UPI senders without verifying intent.

Would you like a template disclaimer for UPI/NEFT receipts to shield yourself better?

And what is this customer paid money via bank cheque 1. From his own back a/c, but money he get in his bank a/c is via illegimate way eg kidmapping, hawala, laundring, etc 2. Form cheque stolen from someone/somewhere about which original cheque owner get knowledge later (10D or more)

Excellent — you're now covering cheque-based payments, a less common but still legally significant method. Let's tackle the two scenarios you gave.

🔍 Scenario 1: **Customer gives cheque from his own account, but the funds in that account were obtained via illegal means**

(e.g., hawala, kidnapping, money laundering — but you don’t know any of this)

✅ Legal Viewpoint:

You are not liable, and the money is legally yours, because:

The cheque was issued from his own account.
The payment was made to you against genuine goods/services.
You acted in good faith and did not know the money was tainted.

❗Caveat:

If authorities later trace the money to crime, they may try to seize assets or freeze accounts, but:

You will be protected as a bona fide recipient.
You cannot be forced to return the amount unless a competent court orders it after proving you were involved or negligent.

Summary: ✅ You keep the money. ❌ No legal/criminal liability unless you're part of the criminal network.

🔍 Scenario 2: Customer gives cheque stolen from someone else's cheque book, and:

The real owner discovers this after 10+ days,
Files complaint and proves cheque was misused,
You already deposited it, got cleared, gave goods/service.

🟥 Legal Consequences Are Serious Here:

1. ✅ Cheque Clearing System Works on Assumed Validity:

If a stolen/fraudulent cheque clears into your account, banks usually credit you in good faith, but the true owner can reverse this via legal route.

2. 🧨 Real owner can:

File FIR under IPC Sections 420/468/471 (cheating, forgery),
Ask police to trace and recover money,
File a civil recovery suit in court,
Get bank accounts frozen (including yours) if needed.

3. 🟠 You may be ordered by court to return the funds, even if:

You acted in good faith,
You already delivered goods/service,
You are not criminally liable.

This is because:

In case of stolen cheque, ownership of funds never legally transferred — the money still belongs to the real account holder.

🔐 Summary of All Cheque Scenarios:

Scenario	Money Yours to Keep?	Risk of Legal Action	Refund Possible?	Comments
1. Cheque from customer's own a/c (tainted source)	✅ Yes	❌ No (if unaware)	❌ No	Innocent party, no fraud
2. Stolen cheque from someone else’s a/c	❌ No (real owner has claim)	⚠️ Yes	✅ Yes (via court/police)	You may lose money even after giving service

🛡️ Best Practices for Cheque Payments:

✅ Always take ID proof when accepting a cheque — especially from a new or high-value customer.
✅ Wait for clearance before delivering high-value goods/services.
✅ For cheques above ₹50,000, note down:
- Cheque number, bank name,
- PAN or Aadhar of the person handing it over (if possible).
✅ Add clause in invoice:

“Goods delivered subject to realization of cheque. Any reversal due to fraud may cause civil recovery.”

Would you like:

A sample receipt clause for cheque payments?
A legal SOP for dealing with bank-related fraud detection?

Let me know and I’ll draft one.

And in case of Demand Draft?

Excellent — demand drafts (DDs) are considered more secure than cheques, but let’s break it down in legal/commercial terms just like we did for cash, card, UPI, and cheque.

🔍 What is a Demand Draft (DD)?

A prepaid negotiable instrument — money is paid in advance to the bank when the DD is issued.
So, bank guarantees payment — unlike a cheque, which depends on the drawer’s account balance at clearing time.

Now, let’s evaluate your two scenarios:

✅ Scenario 1: Customer gives DD from their own account, but the funds came from illegitimate source (hawala, laundering, ransom, etc.)

🟢 Legal Status:

You received the DD legally from a bank.
You delivered goods/services, issued GST invoice, and have no knowledge of illegal fund source.

✅ Result:

You are not liable to return money.
The DD is legally valid and the transaction is complete.
Even if law enforcement traces the source of funds as criminal, you’re a bonafide third-party recipient.

You can keep the money. You are not criminally liable.

❌ Scenario 2: Customer gives you a DD purchased by fraud — e.g., by stealing someone else’s identity, account, cheque, or forging signature.

Here, key difference is:

The real purchaser never intended to issue the DD.
The fraudster misused bank/customer credentials to get the DD.

🔴 Legal Risks:

The real person/bank can claim: “This DD was obtained fraudulently — funds must be returned.”
If you already encashed it and delivered goods, the bank or real account holder may initiate recovery.

❗BUT: DDs are prepaid — so bank liability is stronger than in cheques.

So outcomes depend on how the DD was fraudulently obtained:

Fraud Type	Who bears the loss?	Why
Forged DD entirely (fake paper)	❌ You may lose money	It’s not a valid instrument at all
Real DD but obtained from bank by stealing someone's ID/signature	⚖️ Bank may be liable, not you	Bank error — not merchant fault
Stolen & altered DD	Depends on forgery proof	You may be asked to return if proven fake

Courts generally protect a merchant if you:

Received a genuine DD (from real bank),

Were not aware of any fraud, and

Delivered real goods/services.

🔒 Summary Table: DD Payment Risks

Scenario	Can You Keep the Money?	Risk of Legal Action	Comments
DD from customer's own a/c with illicit money	✅ Yes	❌ No	Safe — you acted in good faith
DD fraudulently created or stolen from someone else	🟡 Maybe	⚠️ Yes	Depends if you could detect fraud — not your fault if DD looks genuine
Fake DD (not issued by any bank)	❌ No	⚠️ Yes	Treated as forgery — higher risk

🛡️ Best Practices for DD Acceptance:

✅ Verify DD at branch or online (some banks allow validation of DD number + amount).
✅ Take photo of DD + ID proof from person handing it.
✅ For DDs above ₹50,000, delay delivery until DD gets verified or cleared.
✅ In your invoice/receipt, add:

“Subject to clearance/validation of demand draft. Goods not returnable unless legally required.”

🧠 Summary: All Payment Modes Compared

Mode	Reversal Possible?	Safe to Keep?	Bank Auto Reversal?	Your Legal Risk
💵 Hard Cash	❌ No	✅ Yes	❌ No	❌ None
💳 Card	✅ Yes (Chargeback)	❌ Risk	✅ Yes	❌ None if unaware
🏦 UPI/NEFT/RTGS	❌ No auto	✅ Yes	❌ No	❌ None if unaware
🧾 Cheque	✅ Yes (if stolen)	❌ Risk	✅ Sometimes	⚠️ If cheque was forged/stolen
📜 Demand Draft	🟡 Rare	✅ Usually	❌ No	⚠️ If fake or stolen DD

Let me know if you want:

A disclaimer or receipt clause for DD payments,
A flowchart SOP for handling large-value payment modes securely.

So accepting money in Hard Cash is safest for me in short term, but in long term this will create doubt in my business in eyes of laws, legal dept. Accepting money in POS via credit /debit card is most unsafe, but chances of doubt in my business is least in long term in eyes of laws, legal dept. In case of retail physical store

Yes, you're absolutely correct — your summary reflects the practical legal and financial reality of running a retail physical store in India (and globally too). Here's a more structured breakdown to reinforce and slightly refine your conclusion:

✅ HARD CASH

🔒 Short-term: Safest for You

Instant settlement.
No reversals.
No gateway/transaction fee.
Legal tender.

❗ Long-term: Riskier (in eyes of law/IT dept)

If > ₹2 lakh from one person: triggers IT Rule 114B (PAN mandatory).
Cash-heavy business attracts Income Tax scrutiny (under-reporting suspicion).
Limits on cash expenses under IT Act (Sec 40A(3), etc).
Audit risk increases for:
- High cash sales.
- Low bank deposits.
- Frequent cash withdrawals.

Conclusion:
💵 Cash = short-term legally strong, long-term regulatory scrutiny magnet if disproportionate or unbalanced with business nature.

💳 POS via Debit/Credit Card

⚠️ Short-term: Financially Risky

Chargeback risk — customer may falsely dispute.
Payment delay (T+1/T+2 settlement).
Bank gateway charges (~0.4%–2%).

✅ Long-term: Best legal perception

Fully traceable and auditable trail.
Accepted by all compliance authorities (GST, Income Tax, PMLA).
Reduces suspicion of black money.
Strengthens creditworthiness if applying for loans.

Conclusion:
💳 Card = short-term financial risk, long-term high compliance and legal trust.

🏦 UPI / NEFT / IMPS / RTGS

✅ Short-term: Safe

No chargeback (unlike card).
Instant or T+1 settlement.
Easy to trace for audit.
Very low or no transaction fees (UPI mostly zero cost).

✅ Long-term: Excellent

Fully acceptable in eyes of Income Tax / GST / Enforcement.
Reduces cash dependency.
Minimizes audit risk.

Conclusion:
🏦 UPI/NEFT/RTGS = best mix of short-term safety and long-term legal cleanliness.

🧾 Cheque / 📜 Demand Draft

⚠️ Short-term: Moderate Risk

Cheque bounce = 138 NI Act case.
Stolen/fake cheque/DD = liability to refund or defend legally.
Slow processing, fraud detection late.

✅ Long-term: Legally acceptable

Looks formal, bank-verified.
Good if supported by proper documents & proof.

📊 Final Comparison for Physical Retail Store

Mode	Short-Term Safety	Chargeback Risk	Legal Perception	Best Use Case
💵 Hard Cash	✅✅✅ High	❌ None	⚠️ Medium/Low	Daily small retail, but tracked
💳 Card POS	❌ Risky	✅ High	✅✅✅ Very High	Large volume, high-value customers
🏦 UPI/NEFT	✅✅ Good	❌ None	✅✅ High	Best all-rounder
🧾 Cheque	⚠️ Medium	⚠️ Yes (if stolen)	✅ High	Only known customers
📜 Demand Draft	⚠️ If fake	❌ Rare	✅✅ High	Large B2B prepayments

✅ Recommendations for You (Retail + Full GST + Clean Business Intent)

Accept cash, but keep daily cash register, CCTV, and invoice.
For transactions above ₹50,000–2L, prefer:
- UPI with full customer name,
- Card POS with ID verification,
- Or bank transfer with PAN info.
Match reported GST sales with income tax + bank statement to avoid mismatch notices.
Use POS/UPI to build clean bank trail — helps in loan, franchise, resale, or startup funding.

Let me know if you want:

A payment mode policy chart to paste in your store.
A template SOP for staff to follow while accepting payments securely.

And in case of online retail store, payment gateway already there, which T&C similar to credit/debit card POS machine?

Yes — you're spot-on again.

When you run an online retail store and use a payment gateway (like Razorpay, Paytm, Stripe, CCAvenue, Cashfree, etc.), then:

✅ The payment gateway terms & risks are essentially the same as accepting credit/debit cards on a POS machine — because under the hood, that’s exactly what’s happening (but via web).

🔍 Breakdown: Online Store Payments via Gateway

Supported Modes (customer side):

💳 Credit/Debit Card
🏦 Net Banking
📱 UPI (GPay, PhonePe, Paytm, etc.)
💰 Wallets
🧾 Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL)
🔐 EMI options

✅ Legal & Compliance Status (Your Side):

Factor	Status	Notes
GST compliant?	✅ Yes	Payment + Invoice + Delivery chain required
Income Tax clean?	✅ Yes	Full bank trail available
Refund risk?	⚠️ Yes (see below)	Chargebacks or fraud claims
Bank/Cyber audit risk?	❌ Low	Gateway handles KYC/AML (mostly)
Criminal liability (in fraud cases)?	❌ No, if you acted in good faith	Delivery proof required
Settlement delay?	⚠️ Yes	T+1 to T+5 depending on mode & provider
Fees?	⚠️ Yes	1.5%–3% for cards, 0%–1% for UPI/NetBanking

⚠️ Major Risk: Chargebacks & Fraud Claims

Especially for:

Credit cards, where the cardholder says: “I didn’t do this.”
Stolen UPI/NetBanking credentials, later disputed.
Fake return/refund frauds by malicious customers.

Result:

Gateway may auto-debit your account.
Customer gets refund.
You lose product + money unless you win in dispute process.

🧾 How to Defend in Disputes:

You need:

GST Invoice copy
Proof of shipment/delivery (tracking ID, courier POD, screenshot)
Customer order confirmation email/SMS
CCTV/digital signature, if store pickup

If you can prove delivery + order confirmation, you're usually safe.

🛡️ Best Practices for Online Store

Practice	Why
Use trusted gateway (Razorpay, Stripe, etc.)	Better fraud handling & faster settlements
Enable 3D Secure / OTP for card payments	Prevents most card frauds
Disable risky features (like one-click checkout)	Protects you in fraud
Track order → shipping → delivery with logs	Needed to defend in chargebacks
Store IP address / device fingerprint	Extra fraud protection
Block suspicious behavior (VPN, too many tries, mismatched billing/delivery)	Reduces fraud rate
Terms & Conditions page + Refund Policy	Legal shield

✅ Summary

Mode	Online Gateway Risk = POS?	Chargeback Risk?	Recommended for Online?
💳 Credit/Debit Card	✅ Same	✅ High	Yes, but with fraud detection
🏦 UPI / NetBanking	✅ Same	❌ Low (but still possible)	✅ Highly preferred
Wallet / BNPL	✅ Similar	⚠️ Medium	OK for some cases
COD (Cash on Delivery)	❌ No (manual cash risk)	❌ No chargeback	Use only if return abuse is low

Blog - Mohit Kumar Gupta

How to use gdb in Ubuntu Terminal