Here's a practical, minimal guide for using GDB in Ubuntu terminal — from launching to setting breakpoints and navigating your code. 🧰 Step 1: Compile with Debug Symbols Use -g and disable optimizations ( -O0 preferred for debugging): bash Copy Edit g++ -g -O0 -o myprog myprog.cpp 🚀 Step 2: Launch GDB bash Copy Edit gdb ./myprog You'll see a (gdb) prompt. 🎯 Step 3: Set Breakpoints You can set breakpoints in three main ways : ✅ a. At a function gdb Copy Edit (gdb) break main ✅ b. At a specific file and line gdb Copy Edit (gdb) break myprog.cpp:42 ✅ c. At a method in a class gdb Copy Edit (gdb) break MyClass::doSomething If the symbol is mangled (C++), GDB usually demangles automatically, especially if compiled with -g . ▶️ Step 4: Run the Program gdb Copy Edit (gdb) run 🧠Step 5: Navigate Command Meaning next or n Step over current line step or s Step into function call finish Run until current function returns continue or c Continue until...
Here's a comparison of the GUI toolkits you mentioned, highlighting key features, pros, and cons:
**Toolkit | Key Features | Pros | Cons** |
---|---|---|---|
Enlightenment Foundation Libraries (EFL) | - Native look and feel - Comprehensive widget set - Built-in effects and animations - Advanced graphics capabilities | - Highly customizable - Modern and visually appealing interfaces - Efficient resource management | - Steeper learning curve - Smaller community and resources |
GTK | - Cross-platform - Widely adopted - Extensive widget set - Mature and well-supported | - Native look and feel on most platforms - Large community and resources - Good performance | - Can be less visually appealing out-of-the-box - Steeper learning curve for complex UIs |
IUP | - Cross-platform - Lightweight and efficient - Simple API - Multiple language bindings | - Easy to learn and use - Fast performance - Suitable for embedded systems | - Smaller widget set - Less customization options |
XForms | - Cross-platform - Model-view-controller architecture - Declarative UI definition - Designed for rapid development | - Easy to create complex UIs - Clear separation of concerns - Good for data-driven applications | - Less common and mature - Smaller community and resources |
XVT | - Cross-platform - Native look and feel - Comprehensive widget set - Mature and stable | - Consistent UI across platforms - Good performance - Wide range of widgets | - Proprietary license - Older codebase - Less active development |
Additional Considerations:
- Active Development: GTK and EFL have the most active development, while XForms and XVT are less actively maintained.
- Target Platforms: Consider the toolkit's support for your intended platforms (Windows, macOS, Linux, embedded systems).
- Community and Resources: GTK and EFL have larger communities and more resources available.
- Performance: IUP and XForms are generally known for their efficiency and speed.
- Ease of Use: IUP and XForms often have simpler APIs for basic UI creation.
- Customization: EFL and GTK offer more extensive customization options.
Best Choice: The ideal toolkit depends on your specific project requirements, preferences, and constraints. It's often helpful to experiment with different options to find the best fit.
Comments
Post a Comment
If you have any doubts, please let me know.